Request pricing
Windshield protection film
Three windshield films built on different protection logics — impact absorption, surface hardness, or both. Every one transmits over 90% of light and stays under 1% haze, so the glass looks untouched.
A modern windshield is not a sheet of glass. It carries the rain sensor, the heating element and the ADAS camera that keeps lane assist honest. Replacing it means recalibrating those systems, and on many models the original part is weeks away.
A stone thrown up by the car in front arrives with enough energy to start a crack in that glass. Windshield protection film puts a sacrificial layer in the way: the film absorbs and spreads the impact instead of letting the glass take it in one point.
The second, slower problem is the wipers. Years of blade travel leave micro-scratches that scatter oncoming headlights at night. A hard-coated film takes that abrasion on itself and is replaced when it is worn — the glass underneath is not.
Pick by what the vehicle actually faces: gravel roads, heavy wiper use, or a mix of both.
Effortless installation. Maximum protection.
The thickest of the three, built around a highly elastic shape-memory layer that absorbs and disperses stone-chip impact. Conforms to curved glass without thermoforming and resists the yellowing that affects traditional TPU films.
Where strength meets clarity.
A PET substrate finished with advanced hard coating. The thinnest and clearest option, with the best resistance to wiper friction and prolonged UV exposure of the three.
Hybrid strength, crystal vision.
A composite base that combines polymer impact absorption with PET rigidity — the option where you no longer choose between installation flexibility and surface durability.
The figures that differ between the three. Full protocols are on the specifications page.
| Item | Unit | PPF | PET | Hybrid |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thickness | μm | ~190 | ~120 | ~170 |
| Light transmission | % | >90 | >91 | >90 |
| Haze | % | <1 | <0.3 | <1 |
| Elongation at break | % | >100 | — | — |
| Peel adhesion | gf/inch | >200 | >750 | >450 |
| Water contact angle | ° | >100 | >110 | >100 |
| Abrasion resistance | Haze % | — | <0.2 | <1 |
"—" indicates the parameter is not part of that product's test protocol. See all 17 parameters →
No. All three films transmit over 90% of light with haze below 1%, and PET stays below 0.3%. There is no optical distortion, and the water-repellent surface improves visibility in rain.
PPF if the local roads throw gravel and customers come in with chipped glass. PET if the demand is about keeping glass clear and scratch-free. Hybrid covers both and is the safest single choice for a mixed customer base.
Not for SkyPlex PPF — it conforms to curved glass without thermoforming. PET and Hybrid are engineered with improved flexibility for installation on curvature.
Yellowing index stays below 2 per ASTM D 1925 with UV rejection above 95%. PET additionally passes accelerated QUV weathering per KS M ISO 4892-3.
Cleanly, with no adhesive residue on the glass.
Tell us the market and the volumes and we will send the current price list, the technical booklet and partnership terms.